At this stage, students collaboratively generate ideas about the key elements and structure of the Findings and Discussion section in a research article. The lecturer facilitates a class discussion to help students understand what information should be presented, how to interpret results, and how to connect findings with research objectives and literature.
Activities:
BRAINSTORMING
Specifically, the Findings and Discussion section comprises four main rhetorical moves: (1) providing background information, (2) reporting results, (3) summarizing results, and (4) commenting on results. According to Stoller and Robinson (2013), there are three common typologies or generic structures of the findings and discussion section of a research article. Table 6 displays the typologies.
Table 6. Typologies of Research Article Findings and Discussion Section

Each typology determines how the rhetorical structure is organized. The blocked typology first presents a detailed description and explanation of the findings, followed by a separate discussion section where the authors interpret the results, compare them with previous studies, and explain any expected or unexpected outcomes. In contrast, the iterative typology integrates the findings and discussion, requiring authors to not only report the results but also critically analyze them immediately after presentation. The integrated typology, being the most randomized form of the Findings & Discussion (F&D) section, can make it difficult to distinguish between the findings and discussion elements. The description of each typology can be seen in the following table:
|
Typology |
Structure |
|
Blocked |
Findings presented first, discussion follows separately |
|
Iterative |
Findings and discussion presented alternatively or in blended sequence |
|
Integrated |
Findings and discussion heavily blended, often in the same paragraph or section |
Instructions:
Table for Student Response
|
No |
Journal Article Link |
Identified Typology |
Reasoning |
|
1 |
https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/JEET/article/view/29097 |
Blocked Typology |
Findings are presented first in a clear, and Discussion follows each set of findings, interpreting the results, comparing with previous studies, and linking to broader implications. |
|
2 |
https://www.sdgsreview.org/LifestyleJournal/ article/view/5562/2601 |
|
|
|
3 |
http://www.e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/ index.php/p2m/article/view/181 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
http://www.e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/p2m/ article/view/632 |
|
|
At this stage, students begin to develop their own draft of the Findings and Discussion sections based on their research objectives and questions defined in earlier stages.
Instructions
|
Move |
Your Draft Text (Findings and Discussion) |
|
Move 1 |
|
|
Move 2 |
|
|
Move 3 |
|
|
Move 4 |
|
|
Move 5 |
At this stage, students share their draft Findings and Discussion sections with peers to receive feedback and refine their work. The focus is on improving clarity, cohesion, data presentation, and alignment with research objectives.
At this stage, students revise and refine their draft Findings and Discussion sections based on peer feedback and lecturer comments. The focus is on producing a clear, cohesive, and well-structured final draft that aligns with research objectives and demonstrates effective use of data presentation and Swales’ structural moves.