Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Anisa Nur Arifah
22220061Link gdrive article
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x1Q3Up8-7WDV_uY-8SfjtCgVJuG-LnqB/view?usp=drivesdkAnisa Nur Arifah
22220061Link gdrive article
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1x1Q3Up8-7WDV_uY-8SfjtCgVJuG-LnqB/view?usp=drivesdkAnisa Nur Arifah
22220061Link gdrive abstract and conclusion
Anisa Nur Arifah
22220061Draft Outline
1. Proposed title : The Use of Online Comic for English Language Learning: Students’ perception
2. Target Journal : PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education)
3. Background :
Paragraph 1 – Importance of English as an international language
Paragraph 2 – General Problem in learning English
Paragraph 3 – The use of technology to overcome the problem (shift toward digital-based learning)
Paragraph 4 – The rise of online comic for language learning
Paragraph 5 – Benefits and Previous study about the effectiveness using online comic
Paragraph 6 – Research Gap
Paragraph 7 – Purpose of the research
4. Research Question :
– How are Students’ responses to the use of online comic for English language learning?
– What aspects of English learning do students believe are improved through online comic?
5. Objective of the research :
– To describe students’ responses to the use of online comic for English Language Learning.
– To identify benefits and challenges of using online comics.
6. Methodological Approach :
– Research design – Qualitative Descriptive
– Research subject – College Students
– Participants – seventh semester of college students
– Research Instrument –Questionnaire
– Research Data Collection – Thematic AnalysisNovember 9, 2025 at 12:30 pm in reply to: Worksheet 3.2 – Analyzing the Structure of Scientific Articles (Based on Swales’ Move Analysis) #3300Anisa Nur Arifah (22220061)
Halda Vidya Srikandi Salsabila (22220069)
Nadya Salsabila Ramadhani (22220117)
Ni Made Rintan Prameswari Santi Yuda (22220072)
Rida Rahadathul Aisya Ardani (22220060)Anisa Nur Arifah (22220061)
Halda Vidya Srikandi Salsabila (22220069)
Nadya Salsabila Ramadhani (22220117)
Ni Made Rintan Prameswari Santi Yuda (22220072)
Rida Rahadathul Aisya Ardani (22220060)October 26, 2025 at 10:21 pm in reply to: Worksheet 2.2 Comparing Interview Insights with Journal Guidelines #3259Anisa Nur Arifah
222200611. Based on the interview with our lecture, Mr. Mu’man when compared with journal guidelines, its not much different. Many statements are aligned to the guidelines i found in IJAL and Cakrawala Jurnal. From the writing format, until the etchic we must consider. Its important and aligned with the lecture’s statement.
2. a. We gained information from our lecture, Mr. Mu’man. He told us clearly about writing and submitting a scientific article. We also compared the interview results with IJAL and Cendekiawan. He said that the common pattern using IMRAD (Introduction, Method, Result, and Discussion). But he also said, the most important thing is to read the previous journal. More journal with the relative yet same topic means more better. People excited with that type of topic, but more limited the topic means the topic are not really good, so people usually not really interested in that kind of topic, so the research are limited. But these statements are not aligned with the guidelines in the journal, because the guidelines mostly didn’t talk about the topic of the research, but more talk about the writing format and etchics. Our lecture also said, that every journal publisher had their own criteria to publish the journal so, but even the topic was good, the data was good, still it can be the reason for the journal to be decline if we are not following the criteria, also we must know the etic to write the journal and this statement are aligned with both of the journal guidelines.
b. After i read some criteria from IJAL and cakrawala pendidikan guideliness, i found similarities that align with my sample journal. I also tried to see a few journal as sample from IJAL itself. And most of it using the same main structure IMRAD, and the title is less than 15 words. They were using formal yet understandable writing and they were developed from previous study like some kind of gap,which are also alligned with what our lecture’s said.
c. Our lecture, Mr. Mu’man said that there are strategies to make article. We gained some tips that we must look at the problem in class at first. What is the problem, and what should we do to fixed that. After the problem and the topic gained, looking for the relevant article, read at least ten until twenty journals. It will help us a lot at gaining the inspiration and creating the gap. These gaps and real-life problem will help us a lot in the introduction structure. The structural components are basic, just using IMRAD. But in the method, he gave advised to take the easier one. He didn’t forget to reminded us to follow the journal guidelines and apply journal ethic, espescially when its ready to be published. But the challenges also exist. We must consider the data is true, the theory are valid by following the previous research, and the most challenging one is to lessen the plagiarism. We must be creative to create new innovation in learning.
3. Our lecture, Mr. Mu’man said that High-quality articles must have the ethic and it can be useful to other. It is the most important thing. We cannot do plagiarism or the worst is do manipulation to the data until create a conflicting in the article. Since we develop from the previous research, the score of plagiarsm will relativity high. So it is quite challenging to lower it. However, its part of key similarities in every journal publisher. The pattern to make high-quality journal based on our lecture is, We needed to be more creative, we should able to find the gap in every research and make the research useful. It will make our research is needed to the reader, and to make more accurate don’t forget to adding previous research statement (theory), and we must using logical flow. it means, in IMRAD from introduction, method, until the result and discussion must aligned and connected to each other. Not forget, the language we are using has to be formal, objective, understandable and profesional, it needed to be proofreading first before submitted. The differences with the low quality writing is most of them using general, overly casual style. All of these are also aligned with the journal guidelines.October 17, 2025 at 2:34 am in reply to: Worksheet 1.2 – Exploring Journal Articles through Journal Finders #3184Anisa Nur Arifah
222200611. Its important to every students, not only English Education students because by writing scientific article, it means we are able to create new innovative research in real life time. By the fact that everyday goes by, students always change. The innovative strategies of teaching should developed each day and time, to make sure the process of teaching and learning are effective. By writing a scientific article, it proves that students able to contribute in the field, share original finding especially on a new teaching techniques effectiveness, and able to responsible to their writing. Its also able to develop critical thinking, research skills, and analysis skill on students.
Journal finder I usually use is Google Schoolar. Some of journal finder I also use is Project, and Sinta
2. I found five articles which were interesting for me, it has differences and similarities in some of their aspects. I put all those articles summary in google drive with word format. Here is the link to access it https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vjNks7hlYGyagjo2DO8LFwfZsBAJUjJm?usp=sharing
3. To me its methodology. Because some of article didn’t showed a specific information about it. Such as instruments in the research. They wrote they use interview for the instrument, but I didn’t know what kind of question they use, how to assess the interview sheets, etc. Suddenly, all I know is the research is showed positive results. All of journal parts have their own difficulties to me, like in the introduction. I find it quiet hard to write, looking for a references, till paraphrase. But overall Methodology is rather difficult to understand
4. writing is productive skill (output) so speaking does. To produce some output, we must receive some input which also called as receptive.
Reading, and listening are receptive skills. To be concluded, if we want to create some writing we must receive some input by reading. If we want to be able to speak, we must receive input by listening. By reading journal articles we will write better because we will find some vocabularies that are common used, we find strategies that suit the best, we will find the best approach and kind of method to used, also we will find new insight, opinion and fact from experts so the writing will more accurate. By reading, we will able to analyze multiple sources to build new arguments, statement, rather than just writing summaries.Anisa Nur Arifah
222200611.Based from what i read from 5
articles i found, it all have the same topic or theme. Its about the impact of movies to improve students vocabulary. By movies, students also able to enrich the vocabulary.
I read it when i found myself free from
Work, from school. I read it when i found it
Interesting to read. I access it through
Google Schoolar, and i feel bored and exited
At the same time,because by using movie, we dont need to worry about the students. Because most of students like to watch movie.2. The topic are memoriable one. But the challanging is i still cannot figure it out. Like what kind of question we should start with, what should we do to test it (like what instruments of the question), and the use of movie will always works nowaday? It will be challenging for the teacher if we found out that actually there are a few students who doesn’t like to watch movie.
The language in the article are quiet challanging for me. There are still so much vocabulary I didnt know. And I also thought will students find the language is difficult when they watch movie?Anisa Nur Arifah
222200611.Based from what i read from 5
articles i found, it all have the same topic or theme. Its about the impact of movies to improve students vocabulary. By movies, students also able to enrich the vocabulary.
I read it when i found myself free from
Work, from school. I read it when i found it
Interesting to read. I access it through
Google Schoolar, and i feel bored and exited
At the same time,because by using movie, we dont need to worry about the students. Because most of students like to watch movie.2. The topic are memoriable one. But the challanging is i still cannot figure it out. Like what kind of question we should start with, what should we do to test it (like what instruments of the question), and the use of movie will always works nowaday? It will be challenging for the teacher if we found out that actually there are a few students who doesn’t like to watch movie.
The language in the article are quiet challanging for me. There are still so much vocabulary I didnt know. And I also thought will students find the language is difficult when they watch movie? -
AuthorPosts