Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Aulia Rahma Nurlita
22220057Link Final Article:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DRDiRuWv4FQ4tHKO35EDCfXHmr2ER1-0/view?usp=sharingAulia Rahma Nurlita
22220057Abstract and Conclusion:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b5qLOJ2tnsdzd-Lrq5X1oQJJevrjor13/view?usp=sharingAulia Rahma Nurlita
22220057Link Methodology: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DgaY_STnLl5ePyVGXDrTU7zKtvwovSGQ/view?usp=drivesdk
Aulia Rahma Nurlita
22220057Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/11beFMAt7zVoDVoRdYhk2fTXIqldL6o3a/view?usp=sharing
Aulia Rahma Nurlita
2222000571. Proposed title: Enhancing Students’ Vocabulary through the Guessing Game: Students’ Perspectives
2. Target journal: PROJECT Journal
3. Background:
Paragraph 1 – General Importance of Vocabulary
Paragraph 2 – Problems in Vocabulary Learning
Paragraph 3 – Need for an Engaging and Student-Centered Method
Paragraph 4 – Guessing Game as a Potential Strategy
Paragraph 5 – Previous Studies, Research Gap, and Purpose4. Research Question: What are students’ perspectives on the use of the guessing game in enhancing vocabulary learning?
5. Objective of the study: To explore students’ perspectives on using the guessing game to enhance vocabulary learning.
6. Methodological approach:
– Research Design (RD): Qualitative research design.
– Participants: 8th-grade students from a junior high school in Cimahi.
– Data Collection (DC): Semi-structured interviews with six selected students using ten in-depth questions focusing on usefulness, challenges, and learning value of the guessing game, supported by classroom observations.
– Data Analysis (DA): Interview transcripts and observation notes will be analyzed using thematic analysis.Aulia Rahma Nurlita
22220057
Link the result of analysis 2 articles: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jGkHrwo392y-X2TDnFeRFGNYS64fzGhp/view?usp=sharingAulia Rahma Nurlita (22220057)
Haifa Nenden Andriyana (22220064)
Hanifah Nurul Azijah (22220065)
Ratih Nurlita Niarti (22220063)
Suci Samiarti (22220104)After discussing the task, we summarized the key points into a mind map outlining the essential characteristics of a publishable scientific article.
Aulia Rahma Nurlita (22220057)
Based on my analysis, all the sources actually have similar views on how to write a good scientific article.1. Following Journal Guidelines
From my interview with Miss Gartika, I learned that good scientific writing starts with finding a clear research gap, following the right structure, and avoiding plagiarism. This is similar to the guidelines from IJAL and Cakrawala Pendidikan, which highlight the IMRaD format, APA citation style, and originality. In short, having a good idea isn’t enough if the paper doesn’t follow the journal’s rules.2. Learning from a Sample Article
When I read the IJAL article titled “BIPA teachers’ perspectives on Digital Game-Based Language Learning (DGBLL)”, I could really see how the guidelines were applied. The abstract, introduction, methods, and discussion are clearly written following the IMRaD structure. The article also connects its findings with previous studies, just like what Miss Gartika said about keeping coherence and linking theories.3. Challenges and How to Solve Them
Miss Gartika also mentioned that many writers face problems like writer’s block, time management, and plagiarism. She suggested using tools like Quiltbolt or Grammarly, but reminded me to use them ethically. While journal guidelines focus more on technical things, her advice felt more practical and realistic.4. Similarities and Common Patterns
From the interview, journal guidelines, and sample article, I noticed that all of them emphasize the IMRaD structure and the use of clear, formal, but easy-to-understand language. Common issues like time and formatting can be managed by having good planning and structure. The quality of a paper depends on originality, clarity, and coherence.Conclusion:
The interview shows real experiences, the journal guidelines explain the rules, and the sample article shows how those rules work in practice. From all of them, I can conclude that scientific writing isn’t just about having a great idea, it’s also about writing clearly, ethically, and consistently.Aulia Rahma Nurlita (22220057)
Haifa Nenden Andriyana (22220064)
Hanifah Nurul Azijah (22220065)
Ratih Nurlita Niarti (22220063)
Suci Samiarti (22220104)After receiving feedback from our lecturer and revising some of the previous questions, our group held another discussion to refine and finalize them. The following questions are the final results of our group discussion about academic writing and journal article publication. These questions cover five main categories: process, quality, challenges, resources, and structure & content. We will use these finalized questions for the upcoming interview session with journal editors or reviewers or lecturers to gain deeper insights into the reasons why articles are accepted or rejected.
1. What kind of planning or outline do you recommend before starting to write a scientific article?
2. How can we make our introduction section strong enough to attract reviewers’ attention?
3. In your opinion, what key elements make a journal article high-quality or publishable in reputable journals?
4. What does “clear writing” actually mean from an editor’s perspective, and what specific aspects do they usually focus on when evaluating well-organized writing?
5. What are the most common challenges writers face during the process of writing a journal article, and what strategies can help overcome them?
6. What are the main reasons articles are often rejected by journals, and how can writers minimize those risks?
7. Which digital tools or platforms do you find most effective in supporting academic writing and publication?
8. How many references are generally considered sufficient, and what types of sources are most valued by academic journals?
9. How should the Introduction and Literature Review sections be structured to clearly emphasize the research gap and the rationale of the study?
10. In the Discussion section, how can authors effectively relate their findings to previous research and theoretical frameworks?Aulia Rahma Nurlita
222200571. I think scientific articles are really important for English education students because they contain a lot of useful knowledge. From these articles, we can learn about many research findings related to the English learning environment that are valid and trustworthy. Reading scientific articles also helps us think more critically and see things from different perspectives, since they provide reliable and interesting information. That’s why I believe reading scientific articles is essential for English education students. Personally, I often use Google Scholar to find articles because it’s easy to access and full of credible sources.
2. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-MqExzuXegTYgOaEQdDDWJER3oX6qOdb/view?usp=sharing
3. In my perspective, the most difficult parts of a journal article are the methodology and discussion sections. These parts need deeper understanding and sometimes special guidance, because they deal with data analysis and how to explain the results clearly. It’s not something we can just guess or do carelessly, we really need to know what we’re doing. That’s why I think students should get more support or mentoring to fully understand these sections.
4. I believe reading journal articles can really help us improve our academic writing skills. By reading different kinds of academic works, we can learn how to organize ideas better, use the right academic words, and follow the correct structure of a research paper. It also helps us become more open-minded and critical when reading or writing something. The more we read journal articles, the more we understand how to write our own papers with confidence and better quality.Aulia Rahma Nurlita (22220057)
Haifa Nenden Andriyana (22220064)
Hanifah Nurul Azijah (22220065)
Ratih Nurlita Niarti (22220063)
Suci Samiarti (22220104)Based on our group discussion, we shared our experiences and knowledge about academic writing and journal publication. From the discussion, we identified several important aspects related to the process, quality, challenges, resources, and structure of a research article. Therefore, we formulated the following questions for each category to guide our understanding and future interview session with journal editors or reviewers.
Category 1 – Process
Steps in writing a scientific article
Questions:
1. What kind of planning or outline should we make before writing the article?
2. How do experienced writers plan and organize their writing process effectively?Category 2 – Quality
Characteristics of a high-quality scientific article
Questions:
1. What makes a journal article considered good or high quality by the editors?
2. How do clear writing and good organization help an article get accepted for publication?Category 3 – Challenges
Common onstacles faced by writers and their solutions
Qusetions:
1. What are the biggest challenges faced when writing a journal article, and how can they be solved?
2. What are the factors or reasons an article gets rejected by a journal, and how can writers avoid them?Category 4 – Resources
Support, Media, or Tools Needed for Writing
Questions:
1. What digital tools or platforms are most useful for academic writing?
2. How can access to online journals or research databases help writers in developing their scientific articles?Category 5 – Structure & Content
Main components of a Research Article (RA) in English Language Education
Questions:
1. Why is it important to include a clear statement of novelty or contribution in the Introduction or Conclusion, and what happens if it’s missing?
2. How should the Introduction and Literature Review be structured to clearly highlight the research gap and rationale of the study?
3. In the Discussion section, how can writers effectively connect their findings with previous studies and theoretical frameworks?1. The topic is The Use Of Total Physical Response Method To Teach Students
Motivation For Junior High School, i read that articles last week, and i access the articles from google schoolar. From that article i got the information about my interest in the TPR method. I feel so enjoyed while i’m reading the text, because the author writing concisely and clearly, and the method used is qualitative so it gives me an inspiration for my article.
2. In my opinion, the article has a clear structure but seems a little less formal and there are several typos that make the reader have to focus more to read it. Why is it memorable because this article is the shortest article I have ever read.
