QuiryThink

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Worksheet 4.3 Peer Review Instruction #3357
    ririnrohimat8
    Participant
      in reply to: Worksheet 2.1 – Insight from interview data #3264
      ririnrohimat8
      Participant

        Ririn Rohimat
        22220094
        The resualt of interview with Miss Setya
        In general, the interview results emphasize the importance of having a clear flow of ideas and a well-organized structure in scientific writing. Both the researchers and the interviewees agreed that the main difficulties in writing lie in developing ideas, using correct grammar, and choosing appropriate words. In addition, good scientific writing should be able to answer research questions, use sufficient data, and be easily understood by readers.

        From the interview results, several effective writing strategies can be concluded, such as the importance of creating an outline or mind map before writing, using natural and clear academic language, and ensuring that the data used truly support the research objectives.

        Overall, high-quality scientific writing has several key characteristics: ideas that are logically and coherently arranged, a structure that follows the journal’s template, the use of accurate academic language, and content supported by sufficient data and easily understood by readers.

        in reply to: Worksheet 2.1 – Insight from interview data #3263
        ririnrohimat8
        Participant

          Ririn Rohimat
          22220094

          The results of the interview with Miss Gartika
          In general, the interview results emphasize the importance of having a clear flow of ideas and a well-organized structure in scientific writing. Both the researchers and the interviewees agreed that the main difficulties in writing lie in developing ideas, using correct grammar, and choosing appropriate words. In addition, good scientific writing should be able to answer research questions, use sufficient data, and be easily understood by readers.

          From the interview results, several effective writing strategies can be concluded, such as the importance of creating an outline or mind map before writing, using natural and clear academic language, and ensuring that the data used truly support the research objectives.

          Overall, high-quality scientific writing has several key characteristics: ideas that are logically and coherently arranged, a structure that follows the journal’s template, the use of accurate academic language, and content supported by sufficient data and easily understood by readers.

          ririnrohimat8
          Participant

            Ririn Rohimat
            22220094

            In general, the interview results emphasize the importance of having a clear flow of ideas and a well-organized structure in scientific writing. Both the researchers and the interviewees agreed that the main difficulties in writing lie in developing ideas, using correct grammar, and choosing appropriate words. In addition, good scientific writing should be able to answer research questions, use sufficient data, and be easily understood by readers.

            From the interview results, several effective writing strategies can be concluded, such as the importance of creating an outline or mind map before writing, using natural and clear academic language, and ensuring that the data used truly support the research objectives.

            Overall, high-quality scientific writing has several key characteristics: ideas that are logically and coherently arranged, a structure that follows the journal’s template, the use of accurate academic language, and content supported by sufficient data and easily understood by readers.

            ririnrohimat8
            Participant

              Based on my review of journal guidelines, sample journal articles, and my interview with Miss Setya regarding journal writing, I have concluded the following:

              In general, the interview results emphasize the importance of having a clear flow of ideas and a well-organized structure in scientific writing. Both the researchers and the interviewees agreed that the main difficulties in writing lie in developing ideas, using correct grammar, and choosing appropriate words. In addition, good scientific writing should be able to answer research questions, use sufficient data, and be easily understood by readers.

              From the interview results, several effective writing strategies can be concluded, such as the importance of creating an outline or mind map before writing, using natural and clear academic language, and ensuring that the data used truly support the research objectives.

              Overall, high-quality scientific writing has several key characteristics: ideas that are logically and coherently arranged, a structure that follows the journal’s template, the use of accurate academic language, and content supported by sufficient data and easily understood by readers.

            Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)