Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Haifa Nenden Andriyana
22220064
Abstract & conclusion: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cK6mwGd9ttj20xmn9JfaPG8Uzf3-EWcb/view?usp=sharingHaifa Nenden Andriyana
22220064Abstract & conclusion: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cK6mwGd9ttj20xmn9JfaPG8Uzf3-EWcb/view?usp=sharing
Haifa Nenden Andriyana
22220064Link article: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lXmz2P1_8csC0auFsT4nVJ5jidGXyZU9/view?usp=sharing
Haifa Nenden Andriyana
22220064Haifa Nenden Andriyana
22220064Proposed title: Exploring Teachers’ Perspective on the Use of AI in Teaching English: Attitudes, Benefits, and Challenges
Target jurnal: PROJECT jurnal
Background:
1. Significance of English Language Teaching in the EFL Context.
2. Challenges in preparing English teaching materials in EFL contexts
3. AI as a solution for supporting Teachers’ material preparation
4. Previous research on implementing AI in ELT
5. Gap and objectives of the studyResearch question: What are English teachers’ perspectives on the use of AI for preparing English teaching materials, including their attitudes, perceived benefits, and challenges?
Objective of the study: To explore English teachers’ perspectives on the use of AI for preparing English teaching materials, focusing on their attitudes, the benefits they experience, and the challenges they encounter.
Methodologicahl approach:
-Research design: Qualitative descriptive
-Participants : English Teachers in Junior High School
-Data collection: Interview and questionaire
-Data analysis : Thematic analysisHaifa Nenden Andriyana
22220064
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-7oQew4AKN8iSEVMSoHUc5hbOW98w5wu/view?usp=sharingHaifa Nenden Andriyana
22220064
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-7oQew4AKN8iSEVMSoHUc5hbOW98w5wu/view?usp=sharingHaifa Nenden Andriyana
222200641. The results of the interview with Miss Gartika are very much in line with the guidelines of the IJAL and Cakrawala Pendidikan. Both the interview results and the journal guidelines emphasize the importance of writing according to a clear structure, IMRaD (Introduction, Method, Results, and Discussion). Miss Gartika explained that before starting to write, a researcher should first identify a research gap by reading many previous studies through platforms like Google Scholar and Elicit. This insight aligns with the journal guideline that requires writers to present the background of the problem, the research gap, and end with a statement of the research objective or focus of the study. In addition, novelty is also a determining factor in the quality of an article. This is also emphasized in the Cakrawala Pendidikan journal guidelines, which require to display of research novelty and useful innovations.
2. The sample article I analyzed, “BIPA teachers’ perspectives on Digital Game-Based Language Learning (DGBLL): Attitudes, benefits and challenges in teaching Indonesian as a foreign language”, reflects the same principles that Miss Gartika mentioned. For example, the Introduction of the article presents the background, the gap, and the research objectives. Additionally, the article adheres to the IMRaD format. The discussion section also links the findings to relevant theories, which matches Miss Gartika’s statement that writers must deeply understand theoretical relationships among variables.
3. Yes, several challenges mentioned by Miss Gartika are reflected in both the Cakrawala Pendidikan author guidelines and the sample article “BIPA teachers’ perspectives on Digital Game-Based Language Learning (DGBLL): Attitudes, benefits and challenges in teaching Indonesian as a foreign language”. Challenges she mentioned were writer’s block, which often leads to high plagiarism scores. The guidelines for the similarity index for plagiarism check are pegged at 20%. Miss Gartika also mentioned the challenge in designing or adapting research instruments for topics that have not been widely studied. The sample article “BIPA teachers’ perspectives on Digital Game-Based Language Learning (DGBLL): Attitudes, benefits and challenges in teaching Indonesian as a foreign language” demonstrates how writers explain the instrument validation and reliability testing process in the Methodology section. Another challenge Miss Gartika mentioned is choosing a topic that the writer truly master.
4. Based on the comparison between the interview insights, journal guidelines, and the sample article, I found that high-quality scientific writing shares several important characteristics. Both Miss Gartika and the journals emphasize novelty and structure in writing. A good article should follow the IMRaD format, have a research topic problem. The main difference is that journal guidelines emphasize writing format, while the interview highlights about process of writing, the challenges of writing, and the tools that can help in the process of writing.
From this, I conclude that a high-quality research article must combine the following format (IMRaD) with rhetorical movement.Haifa Nenden Andriyana
222200641. The results of the interview with Miss Gartika are very much in line with the guidelines of the IJAL and Cakrawala Pendidikan. Both the interview results and the journal guidelines emphasize the importance of writing according to a clear structure, IMRaD (Introduction, Method, Results, and Discussion). Miss Gartika explained that before starting to write, a researcher should first identify a research gap by reading many previous studies through platforms like Google Scholar and Elicit. This insight aligns with the journal guideline that requires writers to present the background of the problem, the research gap, and end with a statement of the research objective or focus of the study. In addition, novelty is also a determining factor in the quality of an article. This is also emphasized in the Cakrawala Pendidikan journal guidelines, which require to display of research novelty and useful innovations.
2. The sample article I analyzed, “BIPA teachers’ perspectives on Digital Game-Based Language Learning (DGBLL): Attitudes, benefits and challenges in teaching Indonesian as a foreign language”, reflects the same principles that Miss Gartika mentioned. For example, the Introduction of the article presents the background, the gap, and the research objectives. Additionally, the article adheres to the IMRaD format. The discussion section also links the findings to relevant theories, which matches Miss Gartika’s statement that writers must deeply understand theoretical relationships among variables.
3. Yes, several challenges mentioned by Miss Gartika are reflected in both the Cakrawala Pendidikan author guidelines and the sample article “BIPA teachers’ perspectives on Digital Game-Based Language Learning (DGBLL): Attitudes, benefits and challenges in teaching Indonesian as a foreign language”. Challenges she mentioned were writer’s block, which often leads to high plagiarism scores. The guidelines for the similarity index for plagiarism check are pegged at 20%. Miss Gartika also mentioned the challenge in designing or adapting research instruments for topics that have not been widely studied. The sample article “BIPA teachers’ perspectives on Digital Game-Based Language Learning (DGBLL): Attitudes, benefits and challenges in teaching Indonesian as a foreign language” demonstrates how writers explain the instrument validation and reliability testing process in the Methodology section. Another challenge Miss Gartika mentioned is choosing a topic that the writer truly master.
4. Based on the comparison between the interview insights, journal guidelines, and the sample article, I found that high-quality scientific writing shares several important characteristics. Both Miss Gartika and the journals emphasize novelty and structure in writing. A good article should follow the IMRaD format, have a research topic problem. The main difference is that journal guidelines emphasize writing format, while the interview highlights about process of writing, the challenges of writing, and the tools that can help in the process of writing.
From this, I conclude that a high-quality research article must combine the following format (IMRaD) with rhetorical movement.Haifa Nenden Andriyana
222200641. Writing scientific articles is important for English education students because it helps us practice academic writing skills and develop critical thinking.
The journal finder I usually use is Google Scholar because it is very accessible and provides many article references. Just by entering a few keywords such as “AI in ELT,” hundreds of articles appear. In addition, we can also set the publication date range of the articles we want to read.2. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1oL_tP8VDB8-FnkIq61TeZ7KFCCnrEJIk?usp=sharing
3. The most difficult part to understand is the methodology section, because this section is closely related to research design, data analysis, and instruments. Sometimes I have to reread this section several times to really understand how researchers collect and analyze their data. In addition, this section is difficult to understand because I have no experience in conducting or writing a research article, which makes me feel confused.
4. Reading journal articles greatly helps improve my academic writing skills, because by reading articles, I learn how to write an article well and correctly according to the proper structure. In addition, I also learn the content of the articles by observing the writing patterns.
Haifa Nenden Andriyana
222200641. Writing scientific articles is important for English education students because it helps us practice academic writing skills and develop critical thinking.
The journal finder I usually use is Google Scholar because it is very accessible and provides many article references. Just by entering a few keywords such as “AI in ELT,” hundreds of articles appear. In addition, we can also set the publication date range of the articles we want to read.2. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1oL_tP8VDB8-FnkIq61TeZ7KFCCnrEJIk?usp=sharing
3. The most difficult part to understand is the methodology section, because this section is closely related to research design, data analysis, and instruments. Sometimes I have to reread this section several times to really understand how researchers collect and analyze their data. In addition, this section is difficult to understand because I have no experience in conducting or writing research article, which makes me feel confused.
4. Reading journal articles greatly helps improve my academic writing skills, because by reading articles, I learn how to write an article well and correctly according to the proper structure. In addition, I also learn the content of the articles by observing the writing patterns.
Haifa Nenden Andriyana – 22220064
1. The topic is “Teachers’ perception of the use of AI tools in EFL Classroom.” I read the article last night and accessed it through Google Scholar. When I read the article, I became increasingly interested in AI that can help teachers in teaching English. In addition, the article is also related to the title of my article.
2. The language used is quite challenging, so I had to read it slowly or repeatedly to understand the ideas.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Haifa Nenden Andriyana – 22220064
1. The topic is “Teachers’ perception of the use of AI tools in EFL Classroom.” I read the article last night and accessed it through Google Scholar. When I read the article, I became increasingly interested in AI that can help teachers in teaching English. In addition, the article is also related to the title of my article.
2. The language used is quite challenging, so I had to read it slowly or repeatedly to understand the ideas.
